All 50 states

Standards, evaluation and assessment by state

Which standards you teach, which rubric you are observed against, and which test your students sit — in one table.

Direct answer
Edves supports the academic standards, teacher evaluation framework and standardized assessment of all 50 U.S. states.

Coverage runs against the standard a school is actually accountable to rather than Common Core as a proxy, which matters in the many states that have revised or replaced Common Core under their own names. The table below is the full reference.

How to read this table

Three things vary by state and all three matter when evaluating a platform.

  • Academic standards — what you teach and what coverage reporting must run against. Several states adopted Common Core and have since revised substantially under their own names, so “Common Core aligned” is not the same as aligned to your state.
  • Teacher evaluation framework — the rubric your observations are scored on. See evaluation frameworks for how each is structured.
  • Standardized assessment — what your students sit and what your accountability rating largely rests on. Item format and cognitive demand differ between programs, not just topic coverage.
StateAcademic standardsTeacher evaluationStandardized assessment
Alabama (AL)Alabama College- and Career-Ready Standards (AL CCRS)PEPEACAP
Alaska (AK)Alaska Academic StandardsDistrict-basedPEAKS
Arizona (AZ)Arizona Academic StandardsArizona Teacher & Principal Evaluation ModelAZM2
Arkansas (AR)Arkansas Academic StandardsTESSATLAS
California (CA)California Common Core State StandardsDistrict-based (Stull Act)CAASPP
Colorado (CO)Colorado Academic StandardsLEAPCMAS
Connecticut (CT)Connecticut Core StandardsSEEDSmarter Balanced
Delaware (DE)Delaware Academic StandardsDPAS-IISmarter Balanced
Florida (FL)B.E.S.T. StandardsFEAPFAST
Georgia (GA)Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE)TKESGeorgia Milestones
Hawaii (HI)Hawaii Common Core StandardsHawaii Teacher Performance SystemSmarter Balanced
Idaho (ID)Idaho Content StandardsIdaho Educator Evaluation SystemISAT
Illinois (IL)Illinois Learning StandardsPERAIAR
Indiana (IN)Indiana Academic StandardsRISEILEARN
Iowa (IA)Iowa Core StandardsIowa Teaching StandardsISASP
Kansas (KS)Kansas College- and Career-Ready StandardsKEEPKansas Assessment Program
Kentucky (KY)Kentucky Academic StandardsPGESKSA
Louisiana (LA)Louisiana Student StandardsCompassLEAP 2025
Maine (ME)Maine Learning ResultsMaine Educator Effectiveness ModelThrough-Year Assessment
Maryland (MD)Maryland College- and Career-Ready StandardsMaryland Evaluation SystemMCAP
Massachusetts (MA)Massachusetts Curriculum FrameworksMA Evaluation FrameworkMCAS
Michigan (MI)Michigan Academic StandardsMI Educator EffectivenessM-STEP
Minnesota (MN)Minnesota Academic StandardsMN Teacher EvaluationMCA
Mississippi (MS)Mississippi College- and Career-Ready StandardsM-STARMAAP
Missouri (MO)Missouri Learning StandardsMO Educator EvaluationMAP
Montana (MT)Montana Content StandardsMT Educator EffectivenessSmarter Balanced
Nebraska (NE)Nebraska Content StandardsDistrict-basedNSCAS
Nevada (NV)Nevada Academic Content StandardsNEPFSmarter Balanced
New Hampshire (NH)New Hampshire College- and Career-Ready StandardsNH Evaluation SystemSmarter Balanced
New Jersey (NJ)New Jersey Student Learning StandardsAchieveNJNJSLA
New Mexico (NM)New Mexico Content StandardsNMTEACHNM-MSSA
New York (NY)New York State Learning StandardsAPPRRegents Examinations
North Carolina (NC)North Carolina Standard Course of StudyNCEESEOG / EOC
North Dakota (ND)North Dakota Content StandardsND Teacher Support SystemND State Assessment
Ohio (OH)Ohio Learning StandardsOTESOhio State Tests
Oklahoma (OK)Oklahoma Academic StandardsTLEOSTP
Oregon (OR)Oregon Academic StandardsOR Educator EffectivenessSmarter Balanced
Pennsylvania (PA)Pennsylvania Core StandardsPA Educator EffectivenessPSSA / Keystone
Rhode Island (RI)Rhode Island Grade Span ExpectationsRI Evaluation SystemRICAS
South Carolina (SC)South Carolina College- and Career-Ready StandardsSC Teaching Standards 4.0SC READY
South Dakota (SD)South Dakota Content StandardsSD Evaluation SystemSmarter Balanced
Tennessee (TN)Tennessee Academic StandardsTEAMTCAP
Texas (TX)Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS)T-TESSSTAAR
Utah (UT)Utah Core StandardsUTESRISE
Vermont (VT)Vermont Education Quality StandardsVT Evaluation SystemSmarter Balanced
Virginia (VA)Virginia Standards of LearningVA Evaluation StandardsSOL
Washington (WA)Washington State Learning StandardsTPEPSmarter Balanced
West Virginia (WV)West Virginia College- and Career-Readiness StandardsWV Evaluation SystemWV Summative Assessment
Wisconsin (WI)Wisconsin Academic StandardsWI Educator EffectivenessForward Exam
Wyoming (WY)Wyoming Content and Performance StandardsWY Evaluation SystemWY-TOPP

Deep dives

Detailed pages covering standards structure, assessment design, evaluation framework and accountability system: Texas, California, Florida, New York, Georgia, Tennessee.

Multi-state operations

Charter management organizations, diocesan networks and independent school groups operating across state lines face a specific problem: each state’s standards, evaluation framework and assessment are different, but leadership needs comparable data across the whole network.

Edves handles this by keeping the state layer configurable per campus while holding a common instructional and observation record above it. A network can report on teaching quality and standards coverage across campuses in four states without forcing all four onto one state’s framework.

When standards change

State standards are revised on a rolling cycle, and a platform mapped to a superseded version is worse than useless because it reports confident coverage against the wrong thing. Standard revisions are remapped by Edves rather than by the district, and the mapping version in force is visible in coverage reports so nobody is reading last cycle’s data as this cycle’s.

Verify with your agency

Framework names, assessment programs and accountability rules change with state legislation and rule-making, sometimes mid-year. The table above reflects Edves’s current coverage; your state education agency is the authority on what currently applies to you. Where the two disagree, tell us — corrections are welcome through the contact page.

Common questions

Frequently asked

Does Edves support my state's academic standards?

Yes. Edves supports all 50 states' academic standards alongside Common Core and NGSS. Coverage reporting runs against the standard your school is accountable to, which matters in states that have revised or replaced Common Core under their own names.

Which teacher evaluation framework applies in my state?

It varies. Texas uses T-TESS, Georgia uses TKES, Tennessee uses TEAM, New York uses APPR, Ohio uses OTES and Louisiana uses Compass, while California, Alaska and Nebraska use district-based models. Many other states use Danielson or Marzano as the basis of their system. The table on this page lists all 50.

What happens when my state revises its standards?

Edves remaps to the revised standards rather than leaving it to the district, and the mapping version in force is visible in coverage reports so last cycle's data is not misread as current.

Can a charter network operate across several states on one platform?

Yes. The state layer — standards, evaluation framework and assessment — is configurable per campus while a common instructional and observation record sits above it, so network leadership gets comparable data without forcing every campus onto one state's framework.

Is Edves aligned to Common Core or to state standards?

Both. Common Core and NGSS are supported, and so are all 50 individual state standard sets, because a state that has diverged from Common Core needs its own standard codes rather than an approximation.

See it run on your own standards.

A 20-minute walkthrough using your state’s standards, your evaluation framework and your reporting requirements.

Schedule a demo

Keep reading